Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Maybe we shouldn't strictly force that a module Main is stored in Main.curry
> since this might cause problems if one wants to deal with several main I/O
> actions which, as far as I know, must all reside inside a module Main.
This is not required in Curry and I do not understand why this
should be required. In our implementation, we can have main
I/O actions in arbitrary modules, and this does not cause
any problem for the compiler, since the compiler always knows
which is the main module for a specific application.
Requiring the existence of a module with a specific name
like "Main" seems to be a choice from older days and is
also not required in languages like Java.
Best regards,
Michael
_______________________________________________
curry mailing list
curry_at_lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/curry
Received on Mo Jan 30 2006 - 09:12:56 CET